Sunglasses at Night
Opinions are not immune to criticism and correction.

Opinions are not immune to criticism and correction.

  1. Opinions are not immune to criticism and correction.
    • Opinions are not immune to criticism and correction.
      1. Opinions are not immune to criticism and correction.
        • Opinions are not immune to criticism and correction.
          1. GOD DAMN IT STOP SAYING “IT’S (JUST) MY OPINION” LIKE IT MEANS ANYTHING.
youranonnews:

UNSEAT THE #1 PUBLIC ENEMY OF THE INTERNET: REPRESENTATIVE LAMAR SMITH
2012 ELECTIONS
Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX21) is bought and paid for in full by the entertainment industry and corporate interests. He no longer serves the constituency of voters who elected him to office 25 years ago. Instead, he has auctioned off his position as a representative of his community to the highest bidder. 
Lamar - senile, stubborn, negative Lamar. In short, Lamar is the king of not giving a flying fuck about the concerns of his constituency - the 99% who depend on him to bring them fair and strong representation in the US Congress. Lamar has not represented his constituency while in Congress — he has MISREPRESENTED them.
Recently, Lamar put his full ignorance and unwillingness to understand modern society on full display when he SPONSORED the now-infamous Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). Widely regarded as one of the most dangerous pieces of legislation that has been written and presented to Congress in recent history, SOPA touched on hot-button issues of censorship, scope of government power, and restricting the Internet. The bill, which would have severely threatened individual liberty and free enterprise both on and offline, was shelved after activists, non-profits, companies that saw its danger banded together in a now-famous Internet blackout.
SOPA, bought and paid for by corporate interests in the entertainment industry (much like Lamar himself), was an incredibly flawed piece of legislation that tried to curtail the Internet and citizens’ ability to enjoy an unrestricted, free Internet. Not only was SOPA poorly written and researched (which Lamar failed to realise or remedy before sponsoring the bill in Congress), but its authors also made no excuse about the fact that it infringed upon every citizen’s constitutional rights and curtailed the use and enjoyment of the Internet for all US citizens. All this in the name of saving the corporate entertainment industry a few dollars from the perceived, not-yet-proven, finical threat from piracy. 
In the 2012 election season, Lamar (a long-time incumbent in the Texas 21st congressional district) faces a direct threat to his seat from the innovative and passionate Richard Morgan, an energetic young software engineer and conservative activist who has stood up boldly to save the Texas 21st from additional misrepresentation by Lamar. Morgan seeks to restore voter faith in their local US Representative — he vows to stand on principle and demonstrate a full commitment to hearing and working for the concerns of his voters, not the corporate entertainment industry. You can donate to Morgan directly HERE and read a Q&A he did on Reddit HERE to get a better idea of his views.
The Internet has already joined together to erect an UNSEAT LAMAR billboard in Lamar’s Texas district. Monies have been raised, but more donations are needed to continue to fuel the opposition candidate, Mr. Morgan, as well as other efforts to show the voters in the Texas 21st just how much Lamar has sold them out to Hollywood. If you can donate your time, money or skills to helping unseat the Number 1 Threat to the Internet, Lamar Smith, please, see HERE for ideas on how you can help. This will take all of us to join together, but the Internet is nothing if not far-reaching and effective. We can do this. Let’s unseat Lamar in 2012. 
Elections NOT auctions,  Mr. Smith. You would do well to remember this.

youranonnews:

UNSEAT THE #1 PUBLIC ENEMY OF THE INTERNET: REPRESENTATIVE LAMAR SMITH

2012 ELECTIONS

Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX21) is bought and paid for in full by the entertainment industry and corporate interests. He no longer serves the constituency of voters who elected him to office 25 years ago. Instead, he has auctioned off his position as a representative of his community to the highest bidder. 

Lamar - senile, stubborn, negative Lamar. In short, Lamar is the king of not giving a flying fuck about the concerns of his constituency - the 99% who depend on him to bring them fair and strong representation in the US Congress. Lamar has not represented his constituency while in Congress — he has MISREPRESENTED them.

Recently, Lamar put his full ignorance and unwillingness to understand modern society on full display when he SPONSORED the now-infamous Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). Widely regarded as one of the most dangerous pieces of legislation that has been written and presented to Congress in recent history, SOPA touched on hot-button issues of censorship, scope of government power, and restricting the Internet. The bill, which would have severely threatened individual liberty and free enterprise both on and offline, was shelved after activists, non-profits, companies that saw its danger banded together in a now-famous Internet blackout.

SOPA, bought and paid for by corporate interests in the entertainment industry (much like Lamar himself), was an incredibly flawed piece of legislation that tried to curtail the Internet and citizens’ ability to enjoy an unrestricted, free Internet. Not only was SOPA poorly written and researched (which Lamar failed to realise or remedy before sponsoring the bill in Congress), but its authors also made no excuse about the fact that it infringed upon every citizen’s constitutional rights and curtailed the use and enjoyment of the Internet for all US citizens. All this in the name of saving the corporate entertainment industry a few dollars from the perceived, not-yet-proven, finical threat from piracy. 

In the 2012 election season, Lamar (a long-time incumbent in the Texas 21st congressional district) faces a direct threat to his seat from the innovative and passionate Richard Morgan, an energetic young software engineer and conservative activist who has stood up boldly to save the Texas 21st from additional misrepresentation by Lamar. Morgan seeks to restore voter faith in their local US Representative — he vows to stand on principle and demonstrate a full commitment to hearing and working for the concerns of his voters, not the corporate entertainment industry. You can donate to Morgan directly HERE and read a Q&A he did on Reddit HERE to get a better idea of his views.

The Internet has already joined together to erect an UNSEAT LAMAR billboard in Lamar’s Texas district. Monies have been raised, but more donations are needed to continue to fuel the opposition candidate, Mr. Morgan, as well as other efforts to show the voters in the Texas 21st just how much Lamar has sold them out to Hollywood. If you can donate your time, money or skills to helping unseat the Number 1 Threat to the Internet, Lamar Smith, please, see HERE for ideas on how you can help. This will take all of us to join together, but the Internet is nothing if not far-reaching and effective. We can do this. Let’s unseat Lamar in 2012. 

Elections NOT auctions,  Mr. Smith. You would do well to remember this.

Updates from SumOfUs

And yet another installment of “yes Internet activism/petitions can work, dipshits”.

Starbucks: Thank you for standing up for gay rights

Background: In late March, the homophobic National Organization for Marriage (NOM) launched a boycott of Starbucks for its public support of marriage equality in Washington State. We thought that Starbucks, and other businesses, deserved to know that we will support them when they support equality.

Update: We crushed NOM! Our campaign to thank Starbucks for supporting gay marriage went viral, and almost 650,000 people have signed our card — more than 18 times the number of people pledging to boycott Starbucks. Reporters as far away as Shanghai declared NOM’s boycott an utter failure. Dozens of local SumOfUs.org members joined members of Washington United for Marriage in presenting our giant card — which won our online poll — to Starbucks officials at the company’s headquarters in Seattle. Our own campaigner Emma Pullman even dressed up as a Starbucks cup! Hundreds of you provided a personal touch by delivering copies of the card to your local Starbucks.

Read More:SumOfUs press statement on our Thank You card delivery | The original action | Photos from the delivery | Thank You Starbucks crowdsourced Tumblr

Press coverage:The Advocate | NPR | ThinkProgress

Trader Joe’s: Sign the Fair Food Agreement:

Background: Trader Joe’s CEO was refusing to sign the Fair Food Agreement with the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW), a group of farm workers in Florida who have successfully pressured corporate giants like Taco Bell and McDonald’s to agree to ensure that farm workers in their supply chains get treated humanely and get paid at least one penny more per pound of tomatoes they pick.

Update: We won! After partnering up with the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, we got over 65,000 people to send messages to Trader Joe’s. Days after we scaled up our actions — hundreds of us called Trader Joe’s HQ in California, or dropped off letters of support for the Immokalee Workers at our local stores — Trader Joe’s caved to the CIW’s demands and signed the Fair Food Agreement.

Read More: Original petition | Press statement on our victory

Dump Rush!:

Background: Rush Limbaugh viciously attacked Georgetown Law Student Sandra Fluke for speaking publicly about the importance of birth control. Our good friends at Reddit and Media Matters began to compile a list of companies that advertised on Rush’s show. Within 12 hours, the internet was abuzz with calls for Rush’s advertisers to stop supporting his bigotry.

Update: SumOfUs.org members joined the chorus calling for Rush’s sponsors to drop his show. In a matter of days, dozens fled, including AOL and ProFlowers. For the past month, Limbaugh’s ad space has been mostly filled with public service announcements.

Read More:Original petition

Apple: Make the next iPhone and all other products ethically:

Background: In January, the New York Times published an exposé of the horrendous working conditions at Apple’s suppliers in China. Workers were forced to work illegal amounts of overtime, and the lack of basic safety precautions — like ventilators to clear out industrial dust and prevent explosions — meant people were dying to make our iGadgets. Apple knew about all of this, but has turned a blind eye to inconsistencies with their Supplier Code of Conduct.

Update: Major news! After 130,000 SumOfUs.org members signed our petition calling for Apple to make their products ethically, Apple made a public commitment to reducing illegal overtime hours and raising wages for the workers who make its products. This is a very big step, and we are dedicated to the next step: Ensuring that Apple keeps its promise.

Here’s how we got to this point: We kept up the pressure on Apple by delivering your petition to Apple’s management — along with a letter by Apple factory workers poisoned while on the job — at its shareholder meeting in February. When the new iPad came out, we pressed Apple to release worker time cards to show whether or not Apple supplier Foxconn was violating Chinese labor law by forcing workers to work illegal overtime to get the iPad made “on time”.

In response to the pressure from SumOfUs.org members, along with thousands of others, Apple hired the Fair Labor Association (FLA) to investigate the issue — a move that was simultaneously encouraging and frustrating. The FLA is funded by the very same organizations that it investigates, and the inspections were announced in advance, giving management time to push workers’ issues under the rug. And in his first days on the job, FLA President Auret van Heerden seemed more concerned about protecting Apple’s image than protecting its workers.

While imperfect, the investigation did reap significant benefits. The FLA confirmed that workers at Apple suppliers are forced to work illegal amounts of overtime while still being paid such meager wages that many can’t afford to feed and house their families. It also documented scores of health and safety violations and other labor abuses. In response, Apple pledged to clean up its supply chain within fifteen months.

We want to be clear: The solutions Apple has pledged are not perfect. For instance, they fail to recognize the importance of empowered trade unions at these factories. But even so, Apple’s pledge is momentous and could transform as many as one million lives.

However, those lives will only be improved if Apple keeps its promise, which is certainly not guaranteed. To that end, hundreds of SumOfUs.org members have collectively pitched in over $10,000 to make sure we have the resources we need to go the distance with Apple and see this campaign through to complete victory. We have some exciting ideas on the horizon. We are planning to keep up the pressure by publicly tracking Apple’s commitment and pressuring Apple employees at key moments over the next fifteen months. We will not forget Apple’s promise, nor allow CEO Tim Cook to either. We look forward to our continued work with you on this important campaign.

Read more:SumOfUs.org statement on the FLA Report | Photos from the petition delivery at the shareholder meeting | The original petition

Press coverage:Washington Post | International Business Times | Los Angeles Times

London Olympics: Reject Dow as a sponsor:

Background: Dow is responsible for the worst industrial accident in history, the chemical spill in Bhopal, India that has killed tens of thousands of people, and injured hundreds of thousands more. To make matters worse, the site hasn’t been cleaned up for 27 years. Dow is also a sponsor of the Olympics, prompting Indian athletes to threaten a boycott unless the Olympics rejects Dow’s sponsorship.

Update: Nearly 50,000 SumOfUs.org members signed our petition to the Chair of the London Olympics, Lord Coe, and our signatures were delivered to the London Olympic Committee in March. Then Lord Coe committed to meet with Sanjay Verma, an activist and survivor of the tragedy who lost most of his family in the wake of the catastrophe. In the lead-up to the meeting, Sanjay penned a letter to SumOfUs.org members asking us to email Lord Coe directly. Over 20,000 of us flooded Lord Coe’s inbox with messages calling for him to renounce Dow as the sponsor of the London Olympics. Sanjay’s meeting with Lord Coe is coming up soon and we’ll let you know how it goes.

Read More:Original petition | Sanjay’s letter

Press coverage:The Telegraph | Drop Dow Now | Bhopal.com

Hulu, You’re Doing it Wrong

From Free Press:

“This is how we watch TV in the 21st century: We fire up our laptops, our Roku boxes or our mobile devices. We open Hulu. We search for Parks and Recreation. Done.

But Hulu’s owners — Disney, News Corp. and Comcast, which respectively own ABC, Fox and NBC — are trying to ruin this experience.1 If they have their way, you’ll need a cable subscription to watch any TV show on the Internet.

Tell the Three Top Executives of the Companies Behind Hulu: You Can’t Stop the Future of TV

Back in the days before cable, people paid nothing to access network TV over the air. But cable programmers introduced a new model: You pay a lot of money to subscribe to a bundle of channels and then you get all the TV shows you want — and many more that you don’t want.

It turns out people don’t want to pay exorbitant fees for hundreds of channels they’ll never watch (Bruce Springsteen wrote “57 Channels and Nothin’ On” even before the advent of DogTV).

Enter Hulu. The Internet TV site makes it easy for you to watch the shows you want to watch, when you want to watch them, for free. If you want to view them on your mobile device or with an Internet-connected TV, you pay a small monthly fee. That fee, along with traditional commercials, generates revenue.

Hulu now boasts 31 million subscribers who like it that way. It’s how many of us watch TV, and an innovative model for the future of online entertainment.

But Hulu’s owners, including Brian Roberts, Bob Iger and Rupert Murdoch, are chucking all of that out the window.

These gatekeepers at Comcast, Disney and News Corp are moving to an “authentication” system that would allow only cable TV subscribers to access Hulu.

Tell Hulu’s Owners: Don’t Destroy the Future of TV.

These guys are trying to put the Internet genie back in the bottle while destroying the concept of free television that dates back to the earliest days of the medium. It’s up to us to tell them to stop.

Thanks,

Josh, Tim, Candace and the rest of the Free Press team “

Mark Zuckerberg Supports Big Brother

From SumOfUs:

It seems like Facebook will do everything they can to sacrifice your online privacy — even going so far as to publicly support a bill pending in the US Congress that would allow Facebook to hand over your data — and the data of Facebook users around the world — to other corporations or the US military, without a warrant.

Can you sign our urgent petition telling Facebook to drop its support of US government spying on its members?

If the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) passes, companies could intercept your text messages and emails to share with each other and the government — giving the US military the power to track, control, and share almost all of your online information without the use of a warrant. They could even block access to websites, or cut off your internet connection altogether. Like SOPA (which Facebook opposed), CISPA is a major threat to internet freedom and gives the government broad power to protect big media companies at your expense.

Facebook’s opposition was instrumental in shutting down SOPA, but now Facebook is fighting FOR CISPA. That’s why we’re teaming up with our friends at Demand Progress to get Facebook to side with its users instead of military spy agencies, and in the process start a powerful, organized opposition to this dangerous bill.

Sign our joint petition to Facebook now, telling it to stand up against government intrusion into our online privacy rights.

Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, has said “We can’t let poorly thought out laws get in the way of the Internet’s development.” Yet with CISPA, he is supporting a far-reaching law that could dramatically limit our freedom on the internet. CISPA strips away previous privacy laws, and by creating a broad immunity for companies against both civil and criminal liability, it robs citizens of any means of fighting back.

Today vast amounts of our information is routed through the internet — our shopping history, our Google searches, our love letters and personal communications, and much of our activism — and all of it would become a fair target for the US military under a definition of “cybercrime” so broad that anyone could be a suspect.

Tell Facebook to get serious about protecting our privacy from US military and government intrusion.

Thank you for all you do.

- Taren, Claiborne, Emma, Becky, Kaytee and the rest of us

 ———————————————-

More Information:

Cyber Intelligence Bill Threatens Privacy and Civilian Control”, The Center for Democracy & Technology, December 2011
Cybersecurity Bill FAQ: The Disturbing Privacy Dangers in CISPA and How To Stop It”, The Electronic Frontier Foundation, April 2012”

fedoraspooky:

complicatedtriangulated:

jaxtheripper13:

sanityscraps:

colourmeclassy:

Hey everyone, remember the nightmare that was SOPA and PIPA? IT’S NOT OVER!


Reports say that lawmakers will vote on the bill as early as Wednesday, April 25th or Thursday, April 26th. It isn’t looking very good. It is of utmost importance that you contact your local representatives to tell them that you do not agree with this bill and they shouldn’t either. Make your voice heard. Don’t let this happen. 

Want to learn more about CISPA? Check out the EFF’s Cybersecurity Bill FAQ.

Don’t know who your representatives are? Just use this.

It takes maybe five minutes of your time to do this — make the effort. It will certainly be worth it.

GUYS. WE REALLY SHOULD CARE ABOUT THIS. LET’S GET ON THIS SHIT.

Sorry guys to make you feel scared but we need to stand up again ! 

Well that can’t be good…

I have a bad feeling that the only reason SOPA got stopped was because companies were against it… The companies are the only “people” the gov cares about and bothers to protect.

dendropsyche:

dirkstridersarms:

invisiblelad:

occupyallstreets:

CISPA Replaces SOPA As Internet’s Enemy No. 1 (Must Read)
The Internet has a new enemy. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (CISPA), also known as H.R. 3523, is a “cybersecurity” bill in the House of Representatives. While CISPA does not focus primarily on intellectual property (though that’s in there, too), critics say the problems with the bill run just as deep. 
As with SOPA and PIPA, the first main concern about CISPA is its “broad language,” which critics fear allows the legislation to be interpreted in ways that could infringe on our civil liberties. The Center for Democracy and Technology sums up the problems with CISPA this way:

    •    The bill has a very broad, almost unlimited definition of the information that can be shared with government agencies notwithstanding privacy and other laws;    •    The bill is likely to lead to expansion of the government’s role in the monitoring of private communications as a result of this sharing;    •    It is likely to shift control of government cybersecurity efforts from civilian agencies to the military;    •    Once the information is shared with the government, it wouldn’t have to be used for cybesecurity, but could instead be used for any purpose that is not specifically prohibited.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) adds that CISPA’s definition of “cybersecurity” is so broad that “it leaves the door open to censor any speech that a company believes would ‘degrade the network.’”
Moreover, the inclusion of “intellectual property” means that companies and the government would have “new powers to monitor and censor communications for copyright infringement.”
Furthermore, critics warn that CISPA gives private companies the ability to collect and share information about their customers or users with immunity — meaning we cannot sue them for doing so, and they cannot be charged with any crimes.
According to the EFF, CISPA “effectively creates a ‘cybersecurity’ exemption to all existing laws.”

“There are almost no restrictions on what can be collected and how it can be used, provided a company can claim it was motivated by ‘cybersecurity purposes.’” the EFF continues.
“That means a company like Google, Facebook, Twitter, or AT&T could intercept your emails and text messages, send copies to one another and to the government, and modify those communications or prevent them from reaching their destination if it fits into their plan to stop cybersecurity threats.”

Read the full text of CISPA here, or the full official summary at the bottom of this page.
Read More
SIGN THE PETITION TO SAVE THE INTERNET FROM CISPA

Here we go again…signal boost the hell out of this, folks.

This was written by my Congressman. : | Woo.

well hell. joke or not, check this out guys

dendropsyche:

dirkstridersarms:

invisiblelad:

occupyallstreets:

CISPA Replaces SOPA As Internet’s Enemy No. 1 (Must Read)

The Internet has a new enemy. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (CISPA), also known as H.R. 3523, is a “cybersecurity” bill in the House of Representatives. While CISPA does not focus primarily on intellectual property (though that’s in there, too), critics say the problems with the bill run just as deep. 

As with SOPA and PIPA, the first main concern about CISPA is its “broad language,” which critics fear allows the legislation to be interpreted in ways that could infringe on our civil liberties. The Center for Democracy and Technology sums up the problems with CISPA this way:

    •    The bill has a very broad, almost unlimited definition of the information that can be shared with government agencies notwithstanding privacy and other laws;
    •    The bill is likely to lead to expansion of the government’s role in the monitoring of private communications as a result of this sharing;
    •    It is likely to shift control of government cybersecurity efforts from civilian agencies to the military;
    •    Once the information is shared with the government, it wouldn’t have to be used for cybesecurity, but could instead be used for any purpose that is not specifically prohibited.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) adds that CISPA’s definition of “cybersecurity” is so broad that “it leaves the door open to censor any speech that a company believes would ‘degrade the network.’”

Moreover, the inclusion of “intellectual property” means that companies and the government would have “new powers to monitor and censor communications for copyright infringement.

Furthermore, critics warn that CISPA gives private companies the ability to collect and share information about their customers or users with immunity — meaning we cannot sue them for doing so, and they cannot be charged with any crimes.

According to the EFF, CISPA “effectively creates a ‘cybersecurity’ exemption to all existing laws.”

There are almost no restrictions on what can be collected and how it can be used, provided a company can claim it was motivated by ‘cybersecurity purposes.’” the EFF continues.

That means a company like Google, Facebook, Twitter, or AT&T could intercept your emails and text messages, send copies to one another and to the government, and modify those communications or prevent them from reaching their destination if it fits into their plan to stop cybersecurity threats.

Read the full text of CISPA here, or the full official summary at the bottom of this page.

Read More

SIGN THE PETITION TO SAVE THE INTERNET FROM CISPA

Here we go again…signal boost the hell out of this, folks.

This was written by my Congressman. : | Woo.

well hell. joke or not, check this out guys

Obama AFK?

From Fight for the Future:

Can you believe this?  After the largest online protest in history, the Obama administration is still voicing support for SOPA.

We promised to ask for your help if SOPA returned. We’re asking now. This kind of backtracking demands a strong, fast response. We’re running a petition to demand that Obama drop all support for internet censorship.

Our goal? Get more signatures than the top petition on whitehouse.gov — 151,000 signatures. Tell Obama to promise: “I will never advance legislation that blocks websites or disconnects Americans’ internet access.”

What is the White House working on exactly? Just the other day, the administration sent a letter to Congress to demonstrate their support for new internet censorship legislation. A few weeks ago, the White House struck a deal to give corporations private powers to shut down your internet connection (after “six strikes” without due process or judicial review), completely in secret.

Obama’s internet would let private companies block sites and turn off our web connections. Blocking websites censors free speech, hurts jobs, and breaks the internet. These are tactics used by totalitarian governments and we believe they’re never ok.

As Wired noted, “The White House did say that it wouldn’t endorse a bill that endangers freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risks, or negatively affects the DNS system. On the other hand, it says elsewhere that “combating online infringement” — not protecting free speech — is a governmental priority “of the highest order.” What about free speech, Obama?

Sign the petition now, then share it to keep the internet strong. Our friends need to know where the President is currently standing on SOPA.


We couldn’t have stopped SOPA and PIPA without you and all of your friends! And we can’t do it without you now. Let’s make sure SOPA 2.0 never gets written.

Thank you,

Tiffiniy, Zak, Fight for the Future!

To learn more about the White House’s support of internet censorship, see this article on CNet: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57407356-281/white-house-calls-for-new-law-targeting-offshore-web-sites/

Save the Internet from the US

From Avaaz:

“Right now, the US Congress is sneaking in a new law that gives them big brother spy powers over the entire web — and they’re hoping the world won’t notice. We helped stop their Net attack last time, let’s do it again.

Over 100 Members of Congress are backing a bill (CISPA) that would give private companies and the US government the right to spy on any of us at any time for as long as they want without a warrant. This is the third time the US Congress has tried to attack our Internet freedom. But we helped beat SOPA, and PIPA — and now we can beat this new Big Brother law.

Our global outcry has played a leading role in protecting the Internet from governments eager to monitor and control what we do online. Let’s stand together once again — and beat this law for good. Sign the petition then forward to everyone who uses the Internet:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_cispa/?vl
Under the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), if a cyber threat is even suspected, companies we use to access the Internet will have the right to collect information on our activities, share that with the government, refuse to notify us that we are being watched and then use a blanket immunity clause to protect themselves from being sued for violation of privacy or any other illegal action. It’s a crazy destruction of the privacy we all rely on in our everyday emails, Skype chats, web searches and more.

But we know that the US Congress is afraid of the world’s response. This is the third time they have tried to rebrand their attempt to attack our Internet freedom and push it through under the radar, each time changing the law’s name and hoping citizens would be asleep at the wheel. Already, Internet rights groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation have condemned the bill for its interference with basic privacy rights — now it’s time for us to speak out.

Sign the petition to Congress opposing CISPA. When we reach 250,000 signers our call will be delivered to each of the 100 US Representatives backing the bill:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_cispa/?vl
Internet freedom faces threats everyday from governments around the world — but the US is best placed to attack the rights of Internet users because so much of the Net’s infrastructure is located there. Our movement has, time and time again, proven that global public opinion can help beat back US threats to our Net. Let’s do it again.

With hope,

Emma, Rewan, Ricken, Antonia, Lisa, Morgan, Mia, Pascal and the entire Avaaz team


More information

Move over SOPA & PIPA: Here comes CISPA — Internet censorship (Digital Journal)
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/322396

CISPA: Congressional plan to censor Internet concerns critics (Examiner)
http://www.examiner.com/progressive-in-portland/cispa-congressional-plan-to-censor-internet-concerns-critics

Good freedom, bad freedom: Irony of cybersecurity (RT)
http://rt.com/usa/news/usa-internet-cybersecurity-cispa-299/

Internet SOPA/PIPA Revolt: Don’t Declare Victory Yet (Wired)
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/internet-revolt-follow/

H.R. 3523: Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3523