There’s a woman in my town who molested a baby.

And I mean a baby; her victim was 4 months old.

But wait, why are we saying she molested the baby? After all, babies don’t remember anything!!! So how can it be traumatized? It can’t, right? So what did she do wrong if the kid can’t remember the pain or breaking of trust?

Does that make sense to you? No? Good, because it shouldn’t. Now why are we using the same excuse for circumcision?

If it’s expected for an infant to be traumatized over any other issue (not just molestation, but also other forms of abuse, or even accidents such as a broken arm), then why is circumcision any different?

(This is a true story by the way - there really is a woman here who molested a four month old, the sick motherfucker.)